I’ve stumbled across Alister McGrath’s website and been delighted to see that they are offering his 2009 Gifford Lectures for free in PDF format from the site. The lectures are about “Natural Theology”.
So I’ve downloaded them and started reading them. Very interesting. McGrath is better known for his criticism of Richard Dawkins and atheism. I’ve got a book of his called “The Twilight of Atheism” which I’ve only gotten about half-way through, even though I bought it some time ago. I found it a really interesting book, and am keen to actually get more into McGrath’s stuff.
I can’t say why I’ve been so interested in Natural Theology for a long time now, and finding this has actually helped me understand more that Natural Theology is probably what I’ve been looking for. I think it may be that, in recent times at least, the doctrine of Creation has not taken much of a centre stage and I have a feeling that the atheists have taken over in providing answers from/for creation – or pantheists – much to our detriment.
To counter-act this, many spiritual people have resorted to pantheism or something thereabouts (the new Avatar movie has also brought some thinking in this direction) to try and find something spiritual in creation. This is because they may find the atheist’s look at the whole ordeal lacking in depth. (I do!) The church seems to have avoided the subject in many ways, maybe because of it’s fear of Science and therefore hasn’t provided adequate spiritual answers for creation for those who are seeking. These are at least my thoughts.
If we continue down this road, we’ll have a real onslaught of both Pantheism and Atheism on people’s thinking, even on Christian thinking, simply because contemporary Christian theology isn’t providing any answers of depth in the area of creation.
I think that the doctrine of Omnipresence (God is everywhere) is a much deeper and more beautiful doctrine that Pantheism (God is in everything) as it takes God out of a box. This is only one reason why I think this. But many people haven’t really pondered Omnipresence and creation together. At any rate, I’m excited to go through McGrath’s stuff and hear his insights.
As to Avatar, as I need to mention it since I saw it last night, here’s what I think — It’s long and got a lot of cliches. Having said that, it’s a great CG fest and entertaining – but they really could have cut it shorter. I’m tired of these long drawn-out epic endings.
They should have also stuck to the score at the end of the movie with the credits rather than some random Titanic-sounding song :). At any rate, the movie isn’t the most brilliant thing I’ve ever seen, even though the special effects are quite amazing, but it is entertaining and great to watch in 3D.